Skip to main content

The Threat of the Insider

Most organizations and indeed security vendors have traditionally focused on the outsider threat when it comes to company security.  By this I'm referring to external hacker threats or threats from the internet and public untrusted networks.  These areas are generally out of the control of the organizational, unable to be manipulated by internal security controls and procedures.  Historically therefor the emphasis was placed on protecting the internal corporate network and resources from users, hackers and services that originated from outside the control of the organization.

Firewalls, Intrusion Detection Systems, Intrusion Prevention Systems and SQL Injection Attacks are amongst the commonly used vocabulary when referring to security from a best practice, education and vendor perspective.

However in recent years the concept of the insider threat has increased.  By this I refer to a systems attack generally originating from someone from within the organization.  Attack in this sense could be classified as anything that could impact the Confidentiality, Integrity or Availability of company information held within the internal network.  A breach in any one of the three main components of information protection could result in information disclosure, security risk, brand damage or compliance misalignment.

But why would a threat emerge from someone within the organization?  The first part is to identify the motive.  This could be be driven by a disgruntled employee, a recently terminated contractor or someone who has identified a process flaw that allows them to perform a fraudulent act.  The second component is the capability.  Whilst hackers require the knowledge of a system vunerability, a pseudonym user and password hacking tools, they will also need to perform blind research of services and process within the organization in order to make a damaging impact on the information held within.  An existing employee however, already has a genuine username and password, deep knowledge of sytems and business process as well as the potential to execute.

Most insider threats can be reduced by restricting user access to the concept of least privilege.  This is not a new idea.  An employee should only have access to the the most basic levels within the systems they require to perform their job.  This access should be managed, continually reviewed and audited.  Terminated users should have their access removed immediately and transferred  users (who have moved between jobs within an organization) should have had their access updated as soon as possible to reflect their new responsibilities.

Not all insider threat comes from active employee attacks.  Some is often based on bad business practice that an individual is simply following as part of their job.  Security education can play a large part in helping to identify insider threats resulting from poor security practice.  For example, access control systems could restrict only senior managers to have access to personal HR files.  However, who cleans down the printer at the end of the day to remove wasted print outs?  These print outs could well have been generated by a user with privileged access but the business process or lack of management could be resulting in a potential security breach further down the information chain.

Popular posts from this blog

Top 5 Security Predictions for 2016

It's that time of year again, when the retrospective and predictive blogs come out of the closet, just before the Christmas festivities begin.  This time last year, the 2015 predictions were an interesting selection of both consumer and enterprise challenges, with a focus on:

Customer Identity ManagementThe start of IoT security awarenessReduced Passwords on MobileConsumer PrivacyCloud Single Sign On
In retrospect, a pretty accurate and ongoing list.  Consumer related identity (cIAM) is hot on most organisation's lips, and whilst the password hasn't died (and probably never will) there are more people using things like swipe login and finger print authentication than ever before.

But what will 2016 bring?

Mobile Payments to be Default for Consumers

2015 has seen the rise in things like Apple Pay and Samsung Pay hitting the consumer high street with venom.  Many retail outlets now provide the ability to "tap and pay" using a mobile device, with many banks also offer…

Customer Data: Convenience versus Security

Organisations in both the public and private sector are initiating programmes of work to convert previously physical or offline services, into more digital, on line and automated offerings.  This could include things like automated car tax purchase, through to insurance policy management and electricity meter reading submission and reporting.

Digitization versus Security

This move towards a more on line user experience, brings together several differing forces.  Firstly the driver for end user convenience and service improvement, against the requirements of data security and privacy.  Which should win?  There clearly needs to be a balance of security against service improvement.  Excessive and prohibitive security controls would result in a complex and often poor user experience, ultimately resulting in fewer users.  On the other hand, poorly defined security architectures, lead to data loss, with the impact for personal exposure and brand damage.

Online-ification: The Role of Identity

The Wikipedia entry for Digital Transformation, "refers to the changes associated with the application of digital technology in all aspects of human society".  That is a pretty broad statement.

An increased digital presence however, is being felt across all lines of both public and private sector initiatives, reaching everything from being able to pay your car tax on line, through to being able to order a taxi based on your current location.  This increased focus on the 'online-ification' of services and content, drives a need for a loosely coupled and strong view of an individual or thing based digital identity.