Skip to main content

Securing Information - An Ideology not a Tool

Keeping stuff secure - it's a funny old business.  I've been fortunate to work at several different ends of that process.  Firstly within industry working alongside business as usual processes and policies, through to vendors making tools to help automate security processes through to implementation at various sized companies requiring business and technical consulting.

At all stages, the main focus was technology.  Configuring a piece of technology so it was more secure: password management, ACL management, encryption standards, service disabling, policy lock downs and so on.

Whilst working at numerous vendors, the main focus was on selling an idea that a tool could automate many of the manual tasks associated with keeping data secure - access certification processes, creating roles to manage ACL, creating audit reports and so on.

One of the big areas missing, was that of focusing on the human involvement in the security process. Whilst undoubtedly tooling has a huge part to place in the full circles driven life cycle of information security, it is individuals who implement the processes and configure the tools.

A recent project I was working on was focused on roles based access control.  Using business level functions to map access instead of using a more error prone and inconsistent system level approach.  Whilst tooling can help with the creation of roles for example, it was often non-IT focused business users who would be using the new system.  That would often require education, a strategy and internal marketing to drive the initiative.

I think many security projects contain a more human focused element, be that education, policy change, control creation or reporting but this area is often neglected or implemented poorly.

As many larger organisations now start to develop separate infosec teams often driven by a Chief Information Security/Systems Officer, security will start to become a more pro-active component of business planning and not just a reactionary technology driven cost centre.

A pro-active business and people lead security ideology will lead to longer term business efficiency and in turn cost savings but also competitive advantage.

Popular posts from this blog

Top 5 Security Predictions for 2016

It's that time of year again, when the retrospective and predictive blogs come out of the closet, just before the Christmas festivities begin.  This time last year, the 2015 predictions were an interesting selection of both consumer and enterprise challenges, with a focus on:


Customer Identity ManagementThe start of IoT security awarenessReduced Passwords on MobileConsumer PrivacyCloud Single Sign On
In retrospect, a pretty accurate and ongoing list.  Consumer related identity (cIAM) is hot on most organisation's lips, and whilst the password hasn't died (and probably never will) there are more people using things like swipe login and finger print authentication than ever before.

But what will 2016 bring?


Mobile Payments to be Default for Consumers

2015 has seen the rise in things like Apple Pay and Samsung Pay hitting the consumer high street with venom.  Many retail outlets now provide the ability to "tap and pay" using a mobile device, with many banks also offer…

Customer Data: Convenience versus Security

Organisations in both the public and private sector are initiating programmes of work to convert previously physical or offline services, into more digital, on line and automated offerings.  This could include things like automated car tax purchase, through to insurance policy management and electricity meter reading submission and reporting.

Digitization versus Security

This move towards a more on line user experience, brings together several differing forces.  Firstly the driver for end user convenience and service improvement, against the requirements of data security and privacy.  Which should win?  There clearly needs to be a balance of security against service improvement.  Excessive and prohibitive security controls would result in a complex and often poor user experience, ultimately resulting in fewer users.  On the other hand, poorly defined security architectures, lead to data loss, with the impact for personal exposure and brand damage.

The Role of Identity Management in the GDPR

Unless you have been living in a darkened room for a long time, you will know the countdown for the EU's General Data Protection Regulation is dramatically coming to a head.  May 2018 is when the regulation really takes hold, and organisations are fast in the act on putting plans, processes and personnel in place, in order to comply.

Whilst many organisations are looking at employing a Data Privacy Officer (DPO), reading through all the legalese and developing data analytics and tagging processes, many need to embrace and understand the requirements with how their consumer identity and access management platform can and should be used in this new regulatory setting.

My intention in this blog, isn't to list every single article and what they mean - there are plenty of other sites that can help with that.  I want to really highlight, some of the more identity related components of the GDPR and what needs to be done.

Personal Data On the the personal data front, more and more org…