Skip to main content

Cloud - Check Your Keys to The Castle First

The 'cloud'.  It's all around us.  Many organisations are utilising cloud based services as part of their overall IT strategy.  This could be in the form of large scale infrastructure such as servers and storage from the likes of Amazon, right through to smaller components such as particular business processes like identity management.  Many Managed Service Security Providers (MSSP) provide a totally outsourced security model with many software components available on-line and on-demand via subscription pricing and the like.

Cloud security is a big concern and quite rightly so.  There should be great emphasis on the necessary agreements that both the client and provider sign up to.  SLA's for example should be well understand as well as provision demarcation points for things like server and hosting platforms.  This helps to avoid the 'no it's on the OS it's your problem', 'well no, you told me to patch it...' issues.

Many issues have been raised regarding data storage with external providers.  Data in-situ and data-in-transit is always a well discussed area.  Encryption via transit over HTTPS/SSL/TLS is all quite well known with plenty of discussion around the coffee machine over what is the best way to encrypt data at rest - hardware based crypto processors, backup shredding and the like all good for a feisty talking point.

Whilst on the topic of data, multi-tenant providers are always under the microscope to avoid data bleeding - where one client can have access to another clients data.  Strict separation of duties at both the logical access control level, right through to operational and physical separation need to be understood and managed.

Whilst all of this is important, it brings me to some simple points that I think are often overlooked.  Security is best managed using a defence-in-depth or circles approach, with the protection of key information assets being complete when several thin layers of security are merged together.  It's pointless having the best encrypted SAN in the western world if you don't have physical access control to the data centre.  Having a complex password policy loses it's muscle if you don't have well managed access control lists on the data shares and so on.  The same can be applied to cloud providers.

For example: to set up an account on any number of platform/server/data/hosting providers, you simply need an email address, password and valid credit card details.  In a few minutes I could launch a few servers, copy several gigs of data, host a new web platform all with a few clicks.  The one single entry point into that environment, which has just become an extension of my organisation's IT department, is an email address and password.  Any attacker now has a much smaller attack space to hit.  One password is what separates a malicious user to a host of services and data that are provided externally.

So, whilst the underlying components could be secured, the entry point to the externally provided components is actually much smaller.

It's often worth thinking like a user (sometimes a malicious user) when managing and implementing any external internet or 'cloud' based extension of your IT provision as it's always the smallest things which are often the most costly.

(Simon Moffatt)

Popular posts from this blog

Customer Data: Convenience versus Security

Organisations in both the public and private sector are initiating programmes of work to convert previously physical or offline services, into more digital, on line and automated offerings.  This could include things like automated car tax purchase, through to insurance policy management and electricity meter reading submission and reporting.

Digitization versus Security

This move towards a more on line user experience, brings together several differing forces.  Firstly the driver for end user convenience and service improvement, against the requirements of data security and privacy.  Which should win?  There clearly needs to be a balance of security against service improvement.  Excessive and prohibitive security controls would result in a complex and often poor user experience, ultimately resulting in fewer users.  On the other hand, poorly defined security architectures, lead to data loss, with the impact for personal exposure and brand damage.

Top 5 Security Predictions for 2016

It's that time of year again, when the retrospective and predictive blogs come out of the closet, just before the Christmas festivities begin.  This time last year, the 2015 predictions were an interesting selection of both consumer and enterprise challenges, with a focus on:


Customer Identity ManagementThe start of IoT security awarenessReduced Passwords on MobileConsumer PrivacyCloud Single Sign On
In retrospect, a pretty accurate and ongoing list.  Consumer related identity (cIAM) is hot on most organisation's lips, and whilst the password hasn't died (and probably never will) there are more people using things like swipe login and finger print authentication than ever before.

But what will 2016 bring?


Mobile Payments to be Default for Consumers

2015 has seen the rise in things like Apple Pay and Samsung Pay hitting the consumer high street with venom.  Many retail outlets now provide the ability to "tap and pay" using a mobile device, with many banks also offer…

Online-ification: The Role of Identity

The Wikipedia entry for Digital Transformation, "refers to the changes associated with the application of digital technology in all aspects of human society".  That is a pretty broad statement.

An increased digital presence however, is being felt across all lines of both public and private sector initiatives, reaching everything from being able to pay your car tax on line, through to being able to order a taxi based on your current location.  This increased focus on the 'online-ification' of services and content, drives a need for a loosely coupled and strong view of an individual or thing based digital identity.